Concept Revision, Concept Application and the Role of Intuitions in Gettier Cases

Abstract The aim of the paper is to determine role intuitions in Gettier cases. Critics Method Cases argue that arguments developed within this method contain a premise justified by its intuitiveness; they also are unreliable sources evidence. By contrast, Max Deutsch argues critique unsound since do not serve as evidence for premises. In cases, an intuitive other called G-Grounds. I propose different view on intuition introduce distinction between concept-revision and concept-application arguments. On basis Craig's Spicer's intension extension, show (1) extension any G-Grounds; (2) play evidential all G-Grounds, but (3) case G-Grounds which used arguments, poor source evidence, while (4) could be reliable if speaker immersed philosophical discourse.